Digitaltest had a densely populated printed circuit board (PCB), and some test points were simply not accessible with fixture pins, because it was not even visible to the naked eye. In addition, the PCB under test contained a boundary-scan capable microchip that also had to be tested. In order to achieve the best possible test coverage, an optimal mix of in-circuit, functional and boundary scan tests had to be found for this application. Digitaltest exclusively used its own test system capabilities, i.e. no boundary scan devices from external manufacturers were used.

In order to be able to increase the own test coverage, the same standardised diagnostic protocol as an in-circuit test was used - in addition to checking the boundary-scan-capable component. In this case, the functionality of the non-boundary scan component is stimulated with the same function with which data is sent to and received from the boundary scan cell by controlling the corresponding input and recording its output signals. In principle, this is as if Digitaltest had built its own test drivers and sensors into the integrated circuits (ICs).

Digitaltest used the current capabilities of its own test system and controlled the Boundary Scan components via simple commands directly from the user interface. The tests could be performed by placing a "Virtual Pin" between a Boundary Scan component and a non-Boundary Scan component directly surrounding it.

Digitaltest was thus able to drastically increase test coverage without incurring additional costs for external equipment. With this concept, even the smallest PCBs with limited test access can be easily tested - even if they are densely populated with tiny components.